🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure version of the president. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from disorder. Although he is called Mikhail, the implication is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list included various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's debut as James Bond. His harder version led local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.